End-users survey | Clim'Foot

Before you begin:

You were recently trained to reduce your carbon footprint in the context of the European Clim’Foot project and you are participating in the voluntary programme, to calculate and reduce your CFO. The main goal of this project is to implement public policies at the European level to calculate and reduce organisations’ carbon footprint, and to provide energy and transitions actors useful tools to help them reduce their emissions. Your participation is essential to the success of this project, in order to gather feedbacks from users of these tools. You will need 10 minutes for completing the survey. We propose you to complete the following survey that is composed of questions we need to optimize our tools. Your data and information will only be used in the framework of the project and will be kept internal to the project. Thank you in advance for your participation in this project.

Information

Surname: *

First name: *

Organisation: *

Position in your organisation: *

Mail address: *

Voluntary programme

Why did you choose to participate at the voluntary programme of Clim’Foot project?

A good opportunity to be supported during my CFO and definition of mitigation plan

My organisation was already involved in such sustainable demarche and it was a continuity

A directive from my top management

I don’t know

How do you wish to use the results of the voluntary programme?

On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 is the best notation), how was the support you had for being trained?

On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 is the best notation), how was the support you had for calculating your carbon footprint?

On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 is the best notation), how was the support you had for defining and implementing a GHG reduction plan?

Do you have any general recommendations to propose for optimizing next voluntary program?

Onsite trainings

On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 is the best notation), what is your opinion about the two-days onsite training?

Technical quality of training (training content, response to expectations)?

Pedagogic quality of training (length of the training, quality of the discussions, pace of training)?

Match between this training and the knowledge/skills require to achieve the voluntary program goal?

In your opinion, concerning the two-days onsite training what can be improved and, what are your needs to better estimate and reduce your GHG emissions?

Online training

On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 is the best notation), what is your opinion about the online training?

Technical quality of training (training content, response to expectations)?

Pedagogic quality of training (ergonomy, length of the training, quality of the discussions, pace of training)?

Match between this training and the knowledge/skills require to achieve the voluntary program goals?

In your opinion, concerning the online training what can be improved and, what are your needs to better estimate and reduce your GHG emissions?

The tool – GHG footprint calculation

On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 is the best notation), how are you satisfied with the tool?

Its ergonomy?

Its ease of use?

Can you describe your use of the Bilan Carbone Clim'Foot tool? What difficulties have you encountered? What solutions have you been able to provide?

Would you be interested by an improved tool? If yes, please specify in what way the tool should be improved.

Set a reduction action plan

On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 is the best notation), did you find useful the methodologies given to you for defining your action plan?

On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 is the best notation), did you find useful the methodologies given to you for quantifying your mitigation action?

Can you explain your process? What difficulties do you encounter? What solutions have you been able to provide?

Would you be interested by improving these methodologies? If yes, please specify in what way they should be improved.

The Clim’Foot cooperation platform

On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 is the best notation), do you find useful the web platform?

Platform look?

Quality of content?

What advices would you like to give us to have a better and useful platform?

Is there any key lesson from this project you would like to share? *

Do you want to mention something else?